blog.info()

In software engineering, the "happy path" is the best case scenario for a user, where they run into no errors or edge cases. Below is a story of how I navigated the "unhappy path," and the lessons I learned.

The Variance

If you look at my Linkedin profile, you'll see someone who went to Stanford University. You'll see a software engineer with years of experience. It looks like a standard success story, and there are probably assumptions that people make about me. They'll likely think that I grew up wealthy, a stable upbringing, perhaps private tutors, or a supportive environment that fostered growth.

The truth couldn't be further from that.

The truth is, my childhood was full of defects and systems that had failed from the very start. All throughout my childhood, my parents suffered from extreme addiction. We didn't have money, and we lived off of food stamps. Our home environment was not psychologically or physically safe. I moved away from my parents at age 12 to live with a relative, then a friend, and then with my brother and sister.

Rather than dwell on the past, I want to go over how I survived and how it changed me.

Systems

The truth is, life is full of systems. We often think of trauma or poverty as random acts of bad luck, but to me, they looked like architecture failures. They were systems that were designed without safeguards.

I realized early on that I couldn't fix the global system I was living in. I couldn't patch my parents' addiction or fix the economy. But I could create my own systems. I could build a mindset of survival that operated independently of the chaos around me.

To do that, I had to master two things: simplicity and stability.

Simplicity as a Defense Mechanism

If you read my engineering posts, you know I am obsessed with simplicity. I advocate for "Zero Docker" when it's not needed, boring technology, and removing abstraction layers.

This is not just an aesthetic preference. It is a survival instinct.

When you grow up in an environment where you have zero control, where resources are scarce and the rules change arbitrarily, you develop a deep aversion to unnecessary complexity. Complexity hides bugs. Complexity creates dark corners where things can break without you noticing.

In my childhood, "stuff" was a liability. Complexity was danger. Safety came from minimalism, from knowing exactly where everything was and how it worked.

I engineer systems the same way I had to engineer my life:

Eliminate the non-essential. If it doesn't need to be there, it is a point of failure.
Own the stack. I need to understand the underlying mechanics because I cannot trust "magic" to keep me safe.
Durability over flashiness. I don't care if the tech is trendy, I care if it will survive a crash.

Incident Response

In this industry, we talk a lot about "incident response." We train for the moment production goes down. We run game days to see how the team reacts under pressure.

I have noticed a consistent pattern during these outages: when the alerts are firing and the team begins to panic, my heart rate implies I am bored. I don't freeze. I don't spiral. I simply start debugging.

This is not because I am inherently braver than my peers. It is a calibration issue.

For many engineers, a critical server failure is the most stressful event of their month. It represents a massive spike above their baseline stress levels. For me, chaos was my baseline for 12 years, from the day I entered this world. A database locking up is objectively problematic, but it is not violent. It does not threaten my physical safety.

I learned to function in high pressure environments before I learned to write code. I learned to compartmentalize fear so I could finish my homework. Today, that trauma manifests as a professional asset: absolute calm when the system is burning down.

The Patch

I am not a prodigy. I am not a "10x engineer" because I was born with a faster processor. I am a good engineer because I was forced to run extensive stress tests on my own operating system before I ever touched a keyboard. I worked hard all my life not for the accolades, but because I knew I had to if I wanted a chance to help my family.

If you're hiring, don't just hire the "happy path" engineers. Look for people who survived the edge cases.